Disposed
Taro & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/33262/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-33202 of 2015 Date of decision: 29.09.2015.
Rajwinder Kaur and another
..Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. Sandeep Wadhawan, Advocate for the petitioners.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
The present petition has been filed for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners as they have solemnized marriage contrary to the wishes of private respondents and are apprehending threat at their instance.
Petitioners, in person, are present in the Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have also moved a representation (Annexure P-5) dated 23.09.2015 to the Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar, Mohali for protection but no action has been taken thereupon.
Notice of motion.
On the asking of the Court, notice on behalf of the State has been accepted by Ms. Ritu Punj, Addl. AG, Punjab.
Keeping in view the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with a direction
NEETU RANI 2015.09.30 11:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Criminal Misc. No. M-33202 of 2015
2
to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar, Mohali to consider the representation moved by the petitioners and take necessary action in accordance with law after hearing the petitioners as well as private respondents.
Disposed of accordingly.
29.09.2015 neetu
(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
NEETU RANI 2015.09.30 11:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether directions can be issued to police authorities to protect life and liberty of persons married contrary to parental wishes.
Whether the State has failed to act on a representation for police protection.
Rajwinder Kaur
another
State of Punjab
Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar, Mohali
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court