A single-paragraph oral order making an interim order absolute after petitions joined investigation. No substantive legal proposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-21856 of 2015 Date of decision: 29.09.2015
Shakil and another
..Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment? Yes/No
2. To be referred to reporters or not? Yes/No
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No
Present: Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Sharad Kumar Yadav, D.A.G., Haryana for the respondent – State.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in compliance of the order passed by this Court on 14.07.2015, the petitioners have joined investigation. The factum of joining investigation has been affirmed by learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Pawan Kumar.
In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned State counsel, the interim order dated 14.07.2015 passed by this Court is made absolute.
Disposed of accordingly.
29.09.2015 neetu
(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
NEETU RANI 2015.09.30 11:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Shakil and another
State of Haryana
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
