The High Court dismissed a petition seeking entrustment of an FIR to CBI. The court held that as the cancellation report was accepted by the court, no ground for further interference under Section 482 CrPC existed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KAPIL 2015.09.17 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
[1]
CRM-M-15097-2015
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
CRM-M-15097-2015 Date of Decision:15.09.2015
Prem Lata
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr. Binat Sharma, Advocate, for Mr. Rajneesh Chadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Trishanjali Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. S.K. Tripathi, Advocate, for the accused.
SABINA, J.
Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 seeking entrustment of FIR No.237 dated 11.04.2015, registered at Police Station Manesar, District Gurgaon to Central Bureau of Investigation for fair, impartial and complete investigation.
Heard.
Learned State counsel has submitted that in the present case after thorough investigation of the case, cancellation report was prepared.
Learned counsel for the accused has submitted that the cancellation report has been accepted by the Court.
KAPIL 2015.09.17 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-15097-2015 [2]
Since, in the present case, cancellation report has
been accepted by the Court, no ground for further interference by this court is made out.
Petition stands disposed of, accordingly.
September 15, 2015 (SABINA) kapil JUDGE
Prem Lata
State of Haryana
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
