Petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC made absolute on fulfillment of investigation requirement. Interim order of 10.04.2015 confirmed as absolute.
Interim bail granted on 10.04.2015 made absolute; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KAPIL 2015.09.14 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
[1]
CRM-M-11855-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-11855-2015 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.09.2015
Dilpreet Singh
.......Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr. A.P.S. Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. J.S. Sekhon, AAG Punjab.
SABINA, J
Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No.44 dated 01.05.2014, under Section 379 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station Kathunangal, District Amritsar Rural.
While issuing notice of motion, following order was passed by this Court on 10.04.2015:-
“ Notice of motion.
Mr. B.S. Bhullar, AAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the State and seeks time to argue the matter.
Copy of the petition be supplied to State Counsel by counsel for the petitioner during course of the day. Adjourned to 06.08.2015.
In the meantime, the arrest of the petitioner shall
CRM-M-11855-2015
KAPIL 2015.09.14 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document [2]
remain stayed subject to the following conditions: -
(i) He shall make himself available for investigation as and when required to do so.
(ii) He will not leave the country without the prior permission of the Court.
(iii) He will not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police official.
Learned State counsel who is assisted by Assistant Sub Inspector Harjinder Singh has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation and is not required for further investigation.
Accordingly, interim bail granted to the petitioner by this Court vide order dated 10.04.2015, is made absolute.
Petition stands disposed of accordingly.
September 14, 2015 kapil
(SABINA) JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether interim bail conditions should be made absolute where the petitioner has joined investigation and no further investigation is required.
Whether the order should dispose of the anticipatory bail petition.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Dilpreet Singh
State of Punjab
SABINA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
