COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.…
Permission to withdraw the petition was granted with liberty to raise pleas before the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl.Misc. No.M-1295 of 2014 Date of Decision : 29.9.2015
Manoj Shukla and others
......Petitioners
Vs.
State of Haryana and another
......Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Present : Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. M.K. Sangwan, DAG, Haryana.
Ms. Avin Arora, Advocate for Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for respondent no.2
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J
After arguing the case at considerable length, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the court to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to the petitioners to raise all possible pleas available to them before the learned trial court at the appropriate stage of the trial.
Permission is granted.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
29.9.2015 (RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) GS JUDGE
GREESH SAHNI 2015.10.01 12:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Manoj Shukla and others
State of Haryana and another
Rameshwar Singh Malik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
