Dismissed
Davinder Singh Gill v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/11896/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2015 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND…
What the court decided
AI extract
of 2015 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CRM No.M-11896 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CRM No.M-11896 of 2015 Date of Decision : 28.9.2015
Davinder Singh
......Petitioner
Vs.
State of Punjab and others
......Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Present : Mr. Fateh Jeet Singh, Advocate for Mr. Ranjan Lakhanpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Anmol Grewal, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Ashish Yadav, Addl. A.G. Haryana. Mr. J.S. Toor, Advocate for respondents no.6 to 8. Mr. K.S. Khehar, Advocate for respondent no.10.
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J
Short reply by way of affidavit dated 24.9.2015 filed on behalf of respondents no.2, 5 and 9 in court today, is taken on record and copy thereof has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner.
Petitioner, by way of present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (`Cr.P.C'. for short) seeks appropriate direction to the respondents that no case should be registered against the petitioner and his wife Smt.Kricpy Khera unless the same is verified by the Director General of Police,Punjab, and in case, if at all, any case is registered against them, 7 days advance notice be given and further investigation of the case be handed over to
GREESH SAHNI 2015.09.29 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
2
CRM No.M-11896 of 2015
some independent agency.
Notice of motion was issued and pursuant thereto, reply has been
filed.
Learned counsel for the State of Punjab submits that identical petition filed by Smt.Kricpy Khera wife of the petitioner bearing CRM No.M2690 of 2015 was disposed of by this court, vide order dated 16.9.2015 and present one is an identical one. She further submits that in view of the fact that one FIR has already been registered, present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of, as such.
Faced with the above, learned counsel for the petitioner also fairly states that let the present petition be disposed of, but liberty may be granted to the petitioner to pursue his remedy, in accordance with law, as and when necessity arises.
In view of the above, instant petition is disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous, however, with liberty as prayed for.
28.9.2015 (RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) GS JUDGE
GREESH SAHNI 2015.09.29 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Davinder Singh
State of Punjab
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court