Petitioners sought to withdraw a petition, submitting that they were residing together peacefully. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn on the date of the order.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KAPIL 2015.11.05 19:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
CRM-M-12524-2015 Date of Decision:05.11.2015
Sumit Panghal and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr. K.L. Saini, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Trishanjali Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
SABINA, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition as petitioners are residing together peacefully.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
November 05, 2015 (SABINA) kapil JUDGE
Sumit Panghal and another
State of Haryana
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
