The petitioner filed the present petition before this court. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition. The court allowed the withdrawal.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KAPIL 2015.11.05 19:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
CRM-M-12063-2015 Date of Decision:04.11.2015
Baldev Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. J.S. Sekhon, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Anuj Balian, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
SABINA, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted
that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
November 04, 2015 (SABINA) kapil JUDGE
Baldev Singh
State of Punjab
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
