A petition seeking quashment of summoning orders under PC 1973 was dismissed after the petitioner withdrew it in court, having already obtained interim bail.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn; interim bail was made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KAPIL 2015.09.28 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
[1]
CRM-M-10671-2015
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
CRM-M-10671-2015 Date of Decision:22.09.2015
Baldev Singh and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr. Sudhir Rana, Advocate, for Mr. Keshav Pratap Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. J.S. Hooda, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
SABINA, J.
Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of orders dated 10.12.2014 and 21.10.2013, whereby petitioners have been summoned to face trial under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
While issuing notice of motion, following order was passed by this Court on 06.04.2015:-
“ Notice of motion only to respondent No.2 be issued for 07.08.2015.
In the meanwhile, petitioner to appear before the Magistrate concerned within 30 days from today and
KAPIL 2015.09.28 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
[2]
CRM-M-10671-2015
the Court shall grant interim bail to the petitioner to its satisfaction which shall remain operative till further orders. ”
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in pursuance to the order passed by this Court dated 06.04.2015, petitioners have surrendered before the trial Court and have furnished interim bail.
Accordingly, interim bail furnished by the petitioner in pursuance to the order dated 06.04.2015, is made absolute.
So far as the merits of the case is concerned, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition to enable the petitioners to take up all the pleas available to them before the trial Court during trial.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
September 22, 2015 kapil
(SABINA) JUDGE
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Baldev Singh and others
State of Haryana
another
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
