In this order, the learned State counsel submitted that the petition has become infructuous as the petitioner was acquitted by the Trial Court. The court described the submission as the ground for the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Crl. Misc.-M No. 10287 of 2015 Date of Decision: 21.9.2015.
Gulshan
......Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. A.S.Sidhu, AAG, Punjab.
None for respondent No. 2.
SABINA, J.
Learned State counsel, on instructions from Head Constable Bachittar Singh, has submitted that this petition has been rendered infructuous as the petitioner has been acquitted by the Trial Court.
Ordered accordingly.
(SABINA) JUDGE
September 21, 2015 Gurpreet
GURPREET SINGH 2015.09.21 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Gulshan
State of Punjab
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
