A single-judge bench dismissed a revision petition as withdrawn. The petitioners sought to revise concurrent orders granting a temporary injunction in a suit involving shop/property possession.
Petition dismissed on withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CR 960/2015
1
114
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of decision:19.02.2015.
Jarnail Singh and another
.............Petitioners
v.
Amar Singh
.............Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH
Present:Mr.Avtar Singh Bhatti,Advocate for the petitioners
Jaswant Singh,J.(Oral)
Defendants are in revision assailing the concurrent orders passed by both the Courts below whereby application of the plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC for grant of temporary injunction has been allowed and the defendants have been restrained from interfering in the possession of the plaintiff in the shop/ suit property.
It is apparent that plaintiff was inducted as a tenant in the suit property/shop by the previous owner from whom the present petitioners/defendants purchased the suit property and thus became the natural landlords. Plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction seeking to restrain the defendants/petitioners from interfering in his possession except in due course of law. His prayer for grant of temporary injunction has been allowed.
After arguing for sometime and having failed to convince the Court, learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the present revision petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(Jaswant Singh) Judge
19.02.2015 joshi
RAJINDER PRASHAD JOSHI 2015.02.19 15:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh.
Jarnail Singh and another
Amar Singh
Jaswant Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
