Counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the petition was not being pressed. The court dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
VINOD KUMAR 2015.03.24 15:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.274 of 2015 Date of decision:24.03.2015
Ranjit Kaur
...Petitioner
Versus
Sh. Ranjeev Kumar and another ...Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present: Mr. Rai Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner. *****
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to
press this petition.
Dismissed as not pressed.
March 24, 2015 ( Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge
Ranjit Kaur
Sh. Ranjeev Kumar
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
