An oral order dismissing a petition as infructuous because the payment in question has already been made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
VINOD KUMAR 2015.03.24 15:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.2495 of 2014 Date of decision:24.03.2015
Sharwan Kumar and others
...Petitioners
Versus
Surina Rajan and others ...Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present: Mr. Mohit Jaggi, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Kirti Singh, DAG, Haryana. *****
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioners submits that this petition has
become infructuous as the payment has been made.
Dismissed as infructuous accordingly.
March 24, 2015 ( Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge
Sharwan Kumar and others
Surina Rajan and others
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
