“From perusal of the above referred evidence on the record, this Court finds that the defendant company made part payment of Rs.2,50,000/- to the plaintiff leaving behind the balance of Rs.19,17,167.72p due from the defendants to the plaintiff. The part payment of Rs.2,50,000/- made by the defendant company to the plaintiff by means of demand draft has been proved on record in this case. The TDS deduction memo dated 31.3.1998 is Ex.P149. Another TDS deduction memo dated 31.3.1998 is Ex.P152 on the record and there is a another TDS deduction memo is Ex.P153. Debit credit memo dated 31.3.1998 is Ex.P150 and another debit credit memo dated 31.3.1998 is Ex.P151. Had the defendant company not been under any liability to the plaintiff, then there was no question of making any part payment by it to the plaintiff in this case on the record. Ex.P269 is cheque dated 03.05.1999 issued by the defendant company to the plaintiff of the sum of Rs.4,00,000/-. Ex.P269 lends corroboration to the case of the plaintiff, otherwise there was no question of issuing this cheque on 3.5.1999 of the amount of Rs.4,00,000/-. Similarly, a cheque for Rs.2,50,000/- Ex.P271 dated 24.8.2000 in favour of the plaintiff is also on the record. The documents Ex.P271 to Ex.P273 have also been duly taken into account by this Court which are the debit notes on the file. From analysis of evidence on the record and from perusal of judgment of the Court below, this Court finds that there is no illegality or material irregularity in the findings of the Court below holding the entitlement of the plaintiff to recover the amount of Rs.19,17,167.72p as price of bales of cotton purchased by the defendant company from the plaintiff on different dates on credit basis.
