Allowed
Ram Phal v. Rajbir
Punjab & Haryana HCRSA/2923/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The appellant stated without prejudice to his rights in another appeal that he did not wish to press the current appeal. The court ordered the matter accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Appeal not pressed; Matter disposed of accordingly.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
¶2
RSA No.2923 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision:29.05.2014
¶3
Ram Phal
¶4
....Appellant
¶5
Versus
¶6
Rajbir
¶7
....Respondent
¶8
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
¶9
- Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment?
¶10
- To be referred to reporters or not?
¶11
- Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
¶12
Present:- Mr. Vijay Kumar Jindal, Advocate
¶13
for the appellant.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Ram Phal
- respondent
Rajbir
Coram
AI extract
Rakesh Kumar Garg
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/2923/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court