The High Court of Punjab and Haryana held that an appeal was infructuous as the matter had been amicably settled between the parties, hence dismissed the appeal.
The appeal was dismissed after acceptance that the matter was amicably settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.1292 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision:07.05.2014
Satnam Singh and others
....Appellants
Versus
Balkar Singh and another
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Present:- Ms. Deepa Jain, Advocate for Mr. Malkeet Singh, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. B.S.Jaswal, Advocate for the respondent-caveator.
RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL)
Counsel for the appellants states that as per instructions,
the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and the instant appeal has become infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
May 07, 2014 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) savita JUDGE
Kadian Savita 2014.05.09 14:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Satnam Singh and others
Balkar Singh and another
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
