Appeal dismissed due to non-deposit of statutory fee of Rs. 25,000 as appellant failed to comply with the order dated 24.01.2014 and made no representation within the given time.
Appeal dismissed for non-deposit of statutory amount of Rs. 25,000.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
���������������������������������������� ��������������
���������������������������
Date of decision: 4th July, 2014
Jai Singh
� Appellant
Versus
Raj Bala and others
� Respondents
����� �����!�"��������#�������$�#��$����������
Present: Mr. Shakti Kaushik, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Rajnish Malhotra, Advocate for respondent No.4.
��$�#��$���������%��������"�
This is owner’s appeal challenging the impugned award.
Along with this appeal, appellant filed an application i.e. CM No.135485CII of 2011 seeking exemption from depositing the statutory amount of �25,000 required for maintainability of this appeal. The said application was rejected vide order dated 24.01.2014 and the appellant was given three weeks’ time to deposit the said amount and the appeal was ordered to be listed for hearing on 03.03.2014, on which date learned counsel for the appellant sought one more
Singh Rattan Pal 2014.07.07 17:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court
2
�������������������������
opportunity to comply with the aforesaid order dated 24.01.2014 and on his request the case was adjourned for 20.05.2014. However, on 20.05.2014, learned counsel representing the appellant submitted before this Court that since the Insurance Company has already deposited the amount of compensation, therefore, the appellant would move an application for recalling of the order dated 24.01.2014 and on his submission, the case was again adjourned for today.
Today, Mr. Shakti Kaushik, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant and has filed his Vakalatnama. However, neither the order dated 24.01.2014 has been complied with nor any such application for recalling the aforesaid order has been filed, as submitted before this Court on 20.05.2014.
Since the appellant has failed to comply with the order dated 24.01.2014, this appeal stands dismissed being not maintainable for non deposit of the statutory amount of �25,000.
���$�#��$����������� ������
�&'(�)%����)� ���
Singh Rattan Pal 2014.07.07 17:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jai Singh
Raj Bala and others
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
