The petition challenging pension-related jurisdiction was disposed of as infructuous since the respondent had retired from a higher post and was already in receipt of pension.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH
Civil Writ Petition No.8644 - CAT of 2001 (O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 10.03.2014
Union of India
…..Petitioner
versus
Nishi Sood and others
.....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTI CE SANJAY KI SHAN KAUL, CHI EF JUSTI CE HON’BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI
Present: Mr. Jagdish Marwaha, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Am an Chaudhary, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2
SANJAY KI SHAN KAUL, CHI EF JUSTI CE : (Oral)
Learned counsel for Union of India/ petitioner states that the original application before the Central Administrative Tribunal was by respondent No.1, who has retired on 28.2.2001 at a much higher post of Chief Matron than that which she was claiming of Matron Group ‘B’ and is further in receipt of pension. Learned counsel, thus, states that the petition has becom e infructuous.
Disposed of as such.
( SANJAY KI SHAN KAUL ) CHI EF JUSTI CE
10.03.2014 ( ARUN PALLI ) parkash* JUDGE
Chand Parkash 2014.03.10 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Union of India
Nishi Sood
Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Arun Palli
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
