The High Court allowed a representation filed by the petitioner to be considered. It directed the respondent to pass a decision on the representation within one month and disposed of the writ petition.
Direction to respondent to take decision on representation within one month; Writ petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH
Civil Writ Petition No.5865 of 2014 (O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 27.03.2014
Sahib Pipes Private Limited
…..Petitioner
versus
Punjab Financial Corporation
.....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTI CE SANJAY KI SHAN KAUL, CHI EF JUSTI CE HON’BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI
Present: Mr. Ravish Bansal, Advocate for
Mr. Ashok Singla, Advocate for the petitioner
SANJAY KI SHAN KAUL, CHI EF JUSTI CE : (Oral)
Notice of motion.
Mr. Sukhdip Singh Brar, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice for the respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the only prayer he is m aking is for consideration of the representation made by the petitioner at Annexure P-5.
We find the aforesaid a fair suggestion. Let a decision be taken on the representation dated 15.1.2014 (Annexure P-5) within a maximum period of one month from today.
A complete set of paper-book be supplied to learned Additional Advocate General during the course of the day.
The petition stands disposed of.
Copy of order be given dasti under signatures of Bench
Secretary to learned Additional Advocate General.
( SANJAY KI SHAN KAUL ) CHI EF JUSTI CE
27.03.2014
( ARUN PALLI ) JUDGE
parkash* Chand Parkash 2014.03.27 14:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sahib Pipes Private Limited
Punjab Financial Corporation
Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Arun Palli
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
