Petitioner filed a writ petition arguing it had become infructuous; the court dismissed it as infructuous but granted liberty to pursue alternative legal remedies.
Petition dismissed as infructuous with liberty to pursue alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 1927 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision : 07.02.2014
Manpreet Kaur @ Dolly
... Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Anu Pal, AAG, Punjab
RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present
petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
However, a liberty is granted to the petitioner to take alternative
remedy in accordance with law.
( RITU BAHRI) JUDGE
07.02.2014
G Arora
Arora Gaurav 2014.02.13 14:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Manpreet Kaur @ Dolly
State of Punjab
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
