This is a two-line order where the High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed a writ petition as having been rendered infructuous by other proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No. 10860 of 1994 Date of Decision:Feb. 6,2014
Teja Singh and another ................................... Petitioners
Versus
UCO Bank and others ................................. Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri
Present: Mr. Harbhajan Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioners states that this writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
( RITU BAHRI ) JUDGE
6.2.2014 rupi
Kaur Rupinder 2014.02.10 11:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Teja Singh and another
UCO Bank and others
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
