Babu Lal and Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 18321 of 2014 Decided on : 05.09.2014
Babu Lal and another
. . . Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others
. . . Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH
PRESENT: Mr. Sudhir Mittal, Advocate for the petitioners.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action by furnishing better particulars in chronological manner.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
September 05, 2014
(FATEH DEEP SINGH) JUDGE
J.Ram
JAWALA RAM 2014.09.06 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Babu Lal
another
Union of India
others
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
JASPAL SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court