High Court at Chandigarh disposed of the writ petition by directing Respondent No.3 to treat it as a representation and to pass appropriate orders within three months.
Direction to Respondent No.3 to treat writ petition as a representation and pass orders within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.17883of2014(O&M)
DATE OF DECISION: 01.09.2014
M/s Suvidha Traders and another …..Petitioners
versus
The State of Haryana and others .....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICEASHUTOSH MOHUNTA,ACTINGCHIEFJUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Present: Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Deepak Manchanda, Advocate for the petitioners
ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral):
Learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that
this writ petition be treated as a representation by respondent
No.3 and appropriate orders be passed thereon within a time-bound
period.
After hearing learned senior counsel for the
petitioners, we dispose of this writ petition with a direction to
respondent No.3 to treat this writ petition as a representation
and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a
period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy
of this order together with a complete set of writ petition.
(ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA)
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
01.09.2014 (HARINDER SINGH SIDHU)
parkash*JUDGE
PARKASH CHAND 2014.09.01 14:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
M/s Suvidha Traders
The State of Haryana
Ashutosh Mohunta
HarINDER Singh Sidhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court