In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, a criminal revision petition was dismissed by a single judge based on the prior decision in LPA No. 265 of 1994 citing that matter as the ground for dismissal.
The petition was dismissed based on the decision in LPA No. 265 of 1994.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 17656 of 1994 Date of decision: 26.04.2014
Krishan Kumar and others
...Petitioner(s)
Versus
Chief Secretary to Government of Punjab and others
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. Nilesh Bhardwaj, DAG, Punjab.
G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral)
Counsel for the State submits that the present petition is liable
to be dismissed in view of the decision rendered in LPA No. 265 of 1994,
Tej Kaur and others vs. Chief Secretary, Punjab and others.
Ordered accordingly.
26.04.2014 shivani
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) JUDGE
Gupta Shivani 2014.04.29 14:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Tej Kaur and others vs. Chief Secretary, Punjab and othersApplied¶14
LPA No. 265 of 1994, Tej Kaur and others vs. Chief Secretary, Punjab and others
Krishan Kumar and others
Chief Secretary to Government of Punjab and others
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
