The High Court of Punjab and Haryana held that the present writ petition rendered infructuous and, accordingly, it was disposed of orally without detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 1406 of 2014 Date of decision: 26.04.2014
Gagandeep Singh and another
...Petitioner(s)
Versus
Malwa School, Gidderbaha and another
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. Kuldeep Joshi, Advocate, for Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioners.
None for respondent no. 1.
Mr. Bharat Jolka, Advocate, for respondent no. 2.
G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral)
Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no. 2.
Counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has been
rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
26.04.2014 (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) shivani JUDGE
Gupta Shivani 2014.04.29 14:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Gagandeep Singh and another
Malwa School, Gidderbaha and another
G.S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
