High Court dismissed a constitution bench petition in writ jurisdiction as infructuous at the hearing, based on the counsel's statement.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 17180 of 2000
Date of decision : 17.11.2014
Ravi Kumar Sharma & anr.
....Petitioners
V/s
Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Punjab & ors.
....Respondents
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. M.S. Kang, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Harit Sharma, Advocate for respondents no. 4 to 7.
RAJAN GUPTA J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that present
petition has been rendered infructuous.
In view of statement made by him, this petition is
dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
November 17, 2014
Ajay
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE
AJAY KUMAR 2014.11.17 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Ravi Kumar Sharma & anr.
Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Punjab & ors.
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
