The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petitioner's CWP by dismissing it as rendered infructuous.
Petitioner's CWP dismissed as rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 16483 of 1996 Date of decision: 21.03.2014
Krishan
...Petitioner(s)
Versus
Civil Judge Judicial (Division), Fatehabad and another ...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. Som Nath Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Anil Dutt, Advocate, for respondent no. 2.
G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioner states that the petition has been
rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as such.
21.03.2014 (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) shivani JUDGE
Gupta Shivani 2014.03.22 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Krishan
Civil Judge Judicial (Division), Fatehabad
another
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
