A criminal court judge granted an oral bench proceeding, in which the impugned order was found infructuous after a statement confirmed disability benefits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.16011 of 2013 Date of decision:09.04.2014
Karamjeet Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
The State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present:- None for the petitioner.
Mr. Nilesh Bhardwaj, DAG, Punjab.
G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J (ORAL)
In the written statement filed, it has been stated that all the candidates who are physically handicapped have been given benefit of 5% relaxation.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of
having been rendered infructuous.
April 09, 2014 (G.S.SANDHAWALIA) savita JUDGE
savita
Kadian Savita 2014.04.11 10:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Karamjeet Singh
The State of Punjab
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
