Oral order directing Senior Superintendent of Police, Moga, to take appropriate action on an application filed by petitioner no.1. Court limited orders to procedural instruction without adjudicating merits of marriage claims.
Direction to respondents no.2 to take appropriate action on application dated 11.01.2014.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM No.M-6319 of 2014
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M- 6319 of 2014(O&M) Date of Decision: February 20, 2014.
Kanta Rani and another
...... PETITIONER(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...... RESPONDENT (s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Petitioners in person with Mr. K.D.S.Sodhi, Advocate, for the petitioners.
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners will
be satisfied if Senior Superintendent of Police, Moga i.e. respondent No.2 is directed to take appropriate action in accordance with law on application dated 11.01.2014 (Annexure P-4), made to him by petitioner no.1.
As per averments made in the petition both the petitioners are major. Date of birth of petitioner No.1-Kanta Rani, as per affidavit, Annexure P1 sworn by her, is 18.10.1990 and age of petitioner No.2 – Jeevan Singh as per copy of Identity Card issued by Election Commission of India, Annexure P1, is 21 years as on 01.01.2003. They got married on 05.01.2014
Singh Omkar 2014.02.20 12:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
CRM No.M-6319 of 2014
2
as per averments made in the petition. Photographs of the marriage are Annexure P3.
In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners in the petition, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 - i.e. Senior Superintendent of Police, Moga to take appropriate action in accordance with law on application dated 11.01.2014 (Annexure P4) as already stated to have been moved to him by petitioner no.1.
However, it is made clear that this order will be having no effect on the validity of alleged marriage of petitioners or on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against petitioner no.2 as per law.
February 20, 2014. ‘om’
( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) JUDGE
Singh Omkar 2014.02.20 12:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
Kanta Rani
Jeevan Singh
State of Punjab
Senior Superintendent of Police, Moga
RAM CHAND GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
