Disposed
Buta Singh @ Buti v. State of Punjab
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/35858/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-35858-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 11, 2014
Buta Singh @ Buti
......Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.G.S.Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Shilesh Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from HC
Resham Singh of Police Station, Dharamot, District Moga, contends that after completion of the prosecution evidence the case is fixed for final arguments before learned trial Court.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the
petitioner does not press this petition at this stage.
Ordered accordingly.
December 11, 2014 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) meenu Judge
MEENU 2014.12.12 11:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
Buta Singh @ Buti
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court