This single-judge oral order allowed the petitioner's application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to recall the dismissal of a previous file (CRM-M-32821 of 2012) for want of prosecution and restored the file to its original number.
Recall the order dated 05.11.2014 dismissing CRM-M-32821 of 2012 and restore the case to its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.37265 of 2014 in/and Criminal Misc.No.M-32821 of 2012 Date of Decision: December 10, 2014
Monika & Anr.
...Petitioners
Versus
UT, Chandigarh
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.Pankaj Bali, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioners.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J. (Oral)
CRM-37265-2014
Prayer in this application, filed under Section 482, Cr.P.C., is for recalling the order dated 05.11.2014 whereby CRM-M-32821 of 2012 was dismissed for want of prosecution.
After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant and going through the contents of the application which is duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed and the order dated 05.11.2014 is hereby recalled.
CRM-M-32821 of 2012 is ordered to be restored to its
original number.
CRM-M-32821-2012
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition to enable the petitioners to raise all the pleas, taken in this petition, before learned trial court at appropriate stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
December 10, 2014 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) seema Judge
SEEMA RANI 2014.12.10 13:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dismissing Crl. Misc. No. M-32821 of 2012 for want of prosecution should be recalled.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Monika & Anr.
UT, Chandigarh
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
