Dismissed
Sunil v. State of Haryana
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/34679/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petition stands dismissed as not pressed by the counsel for the petitioner.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
¶2
Crl. M. No. M- 34679 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision : 21.2.2014
¶3
Sunil
¶4
................Petitioner
¶5
vs.
¶6
State of Haryana
¶7
.................Respondents
¶8
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri
¶9
Present: Sh. Vinod Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
¶10
Sh.S.S. Goripuria, Deputy Advocate General,
¶11
Haryana.
¶12
K.C. Puri, J.
¶13
Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Duli Chand
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Sunil
- respondent
State of Haryana
Coram
AI extract
K.C. Puri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/34679/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court