Bharam Parkash & Ors. v. Rajpal
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No.M-31304 of 2013 * Date of Decision: 14th March, 2014
Bharam Prakash
...Petitioner
Versus
Rajpal
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: None for the petitioner.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.
None was present on behalf of the petitioner. The same was the position on 17.02.2014, 31.01.2014, 22.01.2014, 06.11.2013 and 18.09.2013. After filing of the petition, no one had put in appearance for the petitioner. It appears that neither the petitioner nor his counsel is interested in pursuing the present petition.
Dismissed for want of non-prosecution.
March 14, 2014 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) seema Judge
Sharma Seema 2014.03.18 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Bharam Prakash
Rajpal
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court