This judgment is an oral order dismissing a petition as infructuous because it has been settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-30943-2013 Date of Decision: 11.02.2014
Akaljeet Kaur & Anr.
...... Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab & others
...... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present : Mr. R.K. Arya, Advocate for Mr. Apoorv Garg, Advocate for the petitioners.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the matter has been settled and the petition has become infructuous.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
11.02.2014
(SURINDER GUPTA) JUDGE
Satyawan
Satyawan 2014.02.12 17:54 "I attested to the accuracy and integrity of this document" High Court Chandigarh
Akaljeet Kaur & Anr.
State of Punjab & others
SURINDER GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
