Petitioners sought to withdraw their petition having recorded statements before police, rendering protection unnecessary. The court allowed withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition allowed; matter dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No.M-29765 of 2013 Date of decision : February 10, 2014
Gurdeep Kaur and another
... Petitioners
vs.
State of Punjab and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. Nandan Jindal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Arshdeep S. Kler, AAG, Punjab.
SURINDER GUPTA, J
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the police has recorded the statements of the petitioners and they no more require protection. He sought permission to withdraw the instant petition as it has become infructuous. Request allowed.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
February 10, 2014 (Surinder Gupta) deepak Judge
Deepak Kumar 2014.02.11 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document which has been signed by the Hon'ble Bench High Court, Chandigarh
Gurdeep Kaur and another
State of Punjab and others
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
