Petition not pressed by counsel upon submission by respondents that they would not interfere with the petitioner's peaceful life. Criminal Miscellaneous Writ petition disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No. M-26055 of 2013 Date of Decision: 04th February, 2014
Seema
.. Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & Ors.
.. Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.J.P.Dhull, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Nitin Kaushal, AAG, Haryana.
Mr.M.L.Saini, Advocate, for respondent Nos.4 to 6.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.
Learned counsel for the State submits that the statements of respondent Nos.4 to 6 were recorded that they would not interfere into the peaceful life of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 to 6 also submits that respondent Nos.4,5 and 6 would not interfere into the personal affairs of the petitioner.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition at this stage.
Disposed of as not pressed.
February 04, 2014
(Naresh Kumar Sanghi)
seema Judge
Sharma Seema 2014.02.05 15:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Sharma Seema 2014.02.05 15:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Seema
State of Haryana
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
