Petitioner withdrew the present petition. The matter was dismissed as withdrawn upon hearing the submission of counsel for the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-23153-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 7, 2014
Tahir Hussain
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondent s
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. Vishal Mittal, Advocate, for Mr. Rajesh Bhateja, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Kartar Singh, DAG, Haryana, for respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
Mr. Rohit Sud, Advocate, for respondent No. 4.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has
instructions to withdraw the present petition.
Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to
the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
October 7, 2014 Pkapoor
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
PRASHANT KAPOOR 2014.10.09 12:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Tahir Hussain
State of Haryana
others
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
