The Court directed the Superintendent of Police, Yamunanagar, to provide police protection to the petitioners, who are major and apprehend danger to their life, based on their affidavit regarding marriage and danger.
Respondent No. 2 (Superintendent of Police, Yamunanagar) directed to give proper police protection to the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M-1790 of 2014 DATE OF DECISION : January 17, 2014
Anandeep Kaur and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL
Present Mr. Rakesh Bakshi, Advocate for the petitioners.
M.JEYAPAUL, J.
Both the petitioners are present along with their counsel.
Heard the submissions made by learned counsel appearing
for the petitioners.
They have produced the documents to establish that they have attained majority. They have also sworn to an affidavit that they have got married on 9.1.2014. They apprehend danger to their life. Therefore, respondent no.2 Superintendent of Police, Yamunanagar is directed to give proper police protection to the petitioners.
The petition is disposed of accordingly.
(M. JEYAPAUL) JUDGE
January 17, 2014 p.singh
Singh Parvinder 2014.01.22 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether police protection needs to be granted to petitioners who have attained majority and are apprehending danger to their life.
Anandeep Kaur and another
State of Haryana and others
M. Jeyapaul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
