Petition dismissed as infructuous because the fourth respondent was already in custody. No substantive decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M-1767 of 2014 DATE OF DECISION : January 17, 2014
Rajinder Pal and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others.
...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL
Present Mr. Manjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
M.JEYAPAUL, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that respondent no. 4 was already arrested by the 3rd respondent Senior Superintendent of Police, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali and, therefore, the petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
(M. JEYAPAUL) JUDGE
January 17, 2014 p.singh
Singh Parvinder 2014.01.22 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Rajinder Pal
State of Punjab
M. Jeyapaul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
