The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner, directing compliance with investigation requirements and Section 438(2) of the CrPC upon arrest.
Grant of interim anticipatory bail subject to joining investigation and complying with Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M-1716 of 2014 DATE OF DECISION : February 24, 2014
Parshant Goyal
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL
Present Mr. Anil Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Premjit Singh Hundal, AAG, Punjab.
M.JEYAPAUL, J.
Heard the submission made on either side.
Considering the nature of allegation as against the petitioner,
interim anticipatory bail is granted in the following terms:-
In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. He shall join the investigation as and when required by the Investigating Officer. He shall also comply with the conditions as envisaged under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Petition is allowed.
(M. JEYAPAUL) JUDGE
February 24, 2014 p.singh
Singh Parvinder 2014.02.25 12:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Parshant Goyal
State of Punjab
M. Jeyapaul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
