The High Court of Punjab and Haryana permitted the petitioners to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-1704 of 2014 DATE OF DECISION : January 23, 2013
Dura Ram @ Dhudha and others.
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL
Present Mr. Jai Vir Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Shekhar Mudgal, AAG, Haryana.
M.JEYAPAUL, J.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits
that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the petition.
Permission is granted. The petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(M.JEYAPAUL) JUDGE
January 23, 2013
p.singh
Singh Parvinder 2014.01.23 15:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Dura Ram @ Dhudha and others
State of Haryana
M. Jeyapaul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
