In a bail petition, the High Court held the petitioner to be a fit case for release after 36 days of custody. The court noted the petitioner played no role per the FIR and her son was already on bail, ordering release upon furnishing a bail bond.
Petitioner ordered to be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond to the satisfaction of the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Criminal Misc.No.M-1062 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M-1062 of 2014 DATE OF DECISION : January 22, 2014
Mrs. Kamlesh Devi
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL
Present Mr. Suresh Kumar Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Amandeep Singh, AAG, Haryana.
M.JEYAPAUL, J.
Singh Parvinder 2014.01.22 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2
Criminal Misc.No.M-1062 of 2014
(M. JEYAPAUL) JUDGE
January 22, 2014
p.singh
Singh Parvinder 2014.01.22 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is a fit case for bail after undergoing 36 days of custody without a role in the FIR.
Whether the petitioner should be released on bail given the nature of the charge.
Mrs. Kamlesh Devi
State of Haryana
M. Jeyapaul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
