Sanjay Shetty and Anr. v. State of Haryana and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND…
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Cr.Misc. M 16367 of 2013 Date of decision: 26.2.2014
Sanjay Shetty and anr
.. petitioner
vs
State of Haryana and anr
... respondent
Present Mr. Balwinder Singh, Advocate. Mr. HS Deol, Addl.A.G.Hry Mr. Ajay Ghangas, Advocate.
M.M.S. BEDI,J.
Counsel for the complainant has stated that the matter has not been compromised. Statement of Rajesh Singla respondent No.2 has not been recorded by CJM, Panipat. Even the brother of the complainant Manoj Singla appeared before the said court but stated that the terms and conditions of the compromise have not been complied with.
In view of the above, the dispute having not been resolved, this petition is disposed of as not maintainable at this stage.
Dismissed.
Copy of the terms and conditions, which are required to be fulfilled by the petitioners, has been handed over to the counsel for the petitioner by counsel for the complainant.
February 26 ,2014 ( M.M.S. BEDI ) TSM JUDGE
Mann Tapindar Singh 2014.02.26 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Sanjay Shetty
State of Haryana
M.M.S. BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court