The High Court permitted the withdrawal of the criminal miscellaneous petition and dismissed it as withdrawn. The case involved no substantive legal debate.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M-13415 of 2014 DATE OF DECISION : April 22, 2014
Tejinder Kumar and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL
Present:- Mr. Parveen Kumar Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.
M.JEYAPAUL, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the petition.
Permission is granted. The petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(M. JEYAPAUL) JUDGE
April 22, 2014 p.singh
Singh Parvinder 2014.04.23 11:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Tejinder Kumar
State of Punjab
M. Jeyapaul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
