High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition challenging a trial court order allowing prosecution to summon an unevidenced complainant under Section 311 Cr.P.C. in interest of justice.
The petition challenging the summons of the complainant is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Criminal Misc.No.M-12459 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M-12459 of 2014 DATE OF DECISION : April 21, 2014
Mahinder Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL
Present:- Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.
M.JEYAPAUL, J.
Singh Parvinder 2014.04.23 15:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Criminal Misc.No.M-12459 of 2014
2
further submission that no reason was assigned in the application under Section 313 Cr.P.C. seeking permission to summon the complainant.
the prosecution will be definitely weakened. Further, in the interest of justice the complainant will have to be examined.
(M. JEYAPAUL) JUDGE
April 21, 2014 p.singh
Singh Parvinder 2014.04.23 15:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial court could examine a witness after the prosecution evidence was closed under Section 311 Cr.P.C.
Whether the petitioner was right to object to summoning the complainant after nine failed opportunities.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahinder Singh
State of Haryana
M. Jeyapaull
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
