High Court at Chandigarh dismissed a petition due to non-prosecution as no representation appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
��������������������������
����������������������������
Surinder Kaur and others
..Petitioners
Versus
Gurpreet Kaur @ Neena
..Respondent
Coram: ����� ���!��"#��������$�%�!�&���$�#$��
Present: None
��$�%�!�&��$�#$��'�"�(�!� �
No body appeared on behalf of the petitioners on 10.1.2014 and thereafter on 15.1.2014.
Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners are no longer interested in prosecuting the petition.
Dismissed for non.prosecution.
February 21,2014 (MAHAVIR S.CHAUHAN) nk ��������������� JUDGE
Kant Nirmal 2014.02.24 11:07 I am the author of this document high court chandigarh
Surinder Kaur and others
Gurpreet Kaur @ Neena
Mahavir S. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
