The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition by an appellant as withdrawn at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner on May 16, 2014.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-11367 of 2014 Date of decision: - 16.05.2014
Sonu
..Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Rose Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. H.S. Deol, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, for the State.
Mr. Gulshan Mehta, Advocate for the complainant.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner intends to
withdraw the instant petition, at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for.
May 16, 2014 ( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) naresh.k Judge
Kumar Naresh 2014.05.20 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Sonu
State of Haryana
Mehender Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
