Petitioner moved the High Court of Punjab & Haryana via a criminal miscellaneous petition which was withdrawn at the very beginning of the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-10671 of 2014 Date of decision: - 16.05.2014
Sohan Singh
..Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Amarjit Khurana, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, for the State.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner intends to
withdraw the instant petition, at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for.
May 16, 2014 ( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) naresh.k Judge
Kumar Naresh 2014.05.20 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Sohan Singh
State of Punjab
Mehinder Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
