The writ petition was dismissed without prejudice. No substantive proposition of law was decided or recorded in the order. The charges stand framed already.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-10709-2014 (O&M). Decided on: March 26, 2014.
Amarjit Kaur and others
..... Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and another
..... Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI PRESENT Mr.Gurcharan Dass, Advocate, for the petitioners.
M.M.S. BEDI, J (ORAL).
All the pleas taken up in this petition can be raised
during the course of trial as the charges stand already framed.
Dismissed without prejudice to the other rights of
the petitioners.
(M.M.S. BEDI)
March 26, 2014. JUDGE rka
1
Raj Kumar Arora 2014.03.27 13:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Amarjit Kaur and others
State of Punjab and another
M.M.S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
