Criminal miscellaneous petition dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite multiple notices.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Criminal Misc.-M No. 10420 of 2014 Date of Decision: 09.9.2014.
Savita Sharma
.......Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Abhilaksh Grover, AAG, Haryana.
SABINA, J.
Even on the second call, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. On the last two dates also, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
(SABINA) JUDGE
September 09, 2014 Gurpreet
GURPREET SINGH 2014.09.10 12:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Savita Sharma
State of Haryana
SABINA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
